ArticleJAMA network open2026
Methadone vs Buprenorphine-Naloxone in Opioid Overdose Survivors.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Individuals who experience opioid overdoses are at high risk of death, and data are limited about the comparative effectiveness of medications for this high-risk population. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone in individuals with a past-year history of opioid overdose. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study with target trial emulation included individuals who started methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone treatment between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2023, in Ontario, Canada. Participants had a past-year emergency department visit for an opioid overdose and no use of either medication for 7 days. Individuals starting each medication were matched on a 1:1 basis using propensity scores, sex, and index date. Data were analyzed from November 2024 to June 2026. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was death from any cause within 1 year, analyzed using an initiator approach with Cox proportional hazards regression. The secondary outcomes were opioid overdose and treatment discontinuation. Per-protocol analyses evaluating outcomes before medication discontinuation were also conducted. Results: A total of 5882 individuals were included in the matched cohort (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [10.8] years; 1888 female [32.1%]). In the methadone-initiating group, 165 individuals (5.6%) died within 1 year, compared with 210 (7.1%) in the buprenorphine-naloxone-initiating group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.95; P = .01), with an E-value of 1.9. Median time to treatment discontinuation was 25 days (IQR, 7-131 days) in the methadone group compared with 16 days (IQR, 5-69 days) in the buprenorphine-naloxone group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the time to first opioid overdose (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.97-1.18; P = .17). In the per-protocol analyses, there was no significant difference in the hazard of death among individuals starting methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.48-1.47; P = .55) and an increased hazard of opioid overdose among individuals starting methadone (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.19-1.93; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this matched cohort of individuals with a past-year opioid overdose, starting methadone was associated with a reduced risk of death during the subsequent year compared with starting buprenorphine-naloxone. Treatment durations were short, particularly among individuals starting buprenorphine-naloxone, and there was no significant difference in mortality during receipt of opioid agonist treatment. These findings may be explained by unmeasured confounding, and epidemiologic studies in other jurisdictions are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.