Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42640571›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026

Lessons learned from nationwide perinatal audit of severe postpartum haemorrhage in the Netherlands.

Lisa Broeders, Steven V Koenen, Nicole de Vocht, Thomas van den Akker, Ageeth N Rosman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa BroedersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-8319-2355
Steven V KoenenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fam/ETZ, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0004-7485-4735
Nicole de VochtPerined, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-9578-3718
Thomas van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-9145
Ageeth N RosmanPerined, 3528 BL Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3751-2950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) remains a leading and largely preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Delayed recognition, inappropriate fluid replacement, and suboptimal clinical management contribute to adverse outcomes. Clinical audit can identify deficiencies in care and stimulate quality improvement. In the Netherlands, a nationwide perinatal audit system enables multidisciplinary review of maternity care to enhance collaboration and optimize clinical practice. This study reports the first nationwide audit of severe PPH management in the Netherlands and aims to identify improvable care factors and draw lessons for clinical care.

methodsIn the Netherlands, perinatal audit is nationally coordinated and based on a set of periodic clinical themes. In 2020-3, one such theme was severe PPH, defined as blood loss of ≥2500 ml in the first 24 h after birth or blood loss requiring hysterectomy. Local multidisciplinary audit sessions were held within 'perinatal cooperation groups', comprised maternity care professionals working within a region. During audit sessions, anonymized case reports were reviewed, and areas for improvement of clinical care were identified and documented. Audit findings were analysed quantitatively to group improvable care factors regarding clinical management provided to women sustaining severe PPH. In addition, narrative excerpts from audit reports were used descriptively to provide context to the findings.

resultsIn 116 women sustaining severe PPH, the audit revealed 234 improvable care factors, mostly related to nonadherence to guidelines and standards (47.8%), organization of care (22.3%), and communication and documentation between care professionals and patients (17.1%). Common issues included absence or ambiguity of local management protocols, unclear allocation of responsibilities among team members, limited capacity in terms of staffing and available labour rooms, and incomplete communication and documentation around referral between/within echelons. Nearly half of the improvable care factors were stated by local audit panellists to be likely or possibly associated with severe PPH.

conclusionAudit of PPH care revealed several areas for improvement in the Netherlands, including ensuring sufficient staffing and labour room capacity and updating of national and local management protocols.

Indexed as

Medical AuditPerinatal CarePostpartum HemorrhageClinical AuditFemaleHumansNetherlandsPregnancyQuality Improvementperinatal auditpostpartum haemorrhagepregnancy complications

Identifiers

PMID42640571
PMCPMC13585454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.