ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Systematic Review of Use of Motivational Interviewing to Increase Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Care Continuum Participation.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a prevention approach with potential for reducing HIV incidence with widespread adoption. Despite this, more research is needed to inform interventions to optimize PrEP use. Motivational interviewing (MI) shows promise for enhancing PrEP utilization, however, research comprehensively examining its effectiveness in advancing PrEP care continuum participation remains limited. This study aims to address this deficit through a systematic literature review, utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Let Evidence Guide Every New Decision (LEGEND) guidelines to examine facets of MI's impact on PrEP awareness, uptake, and retention. Though this research is relatively nascent (n = 22), findings indicate MI's effectiveness in advancing PrEP care continuum participation, interventions integrating MI are deemed acceptable and feasible, and various factors (e.g. capable staff, cultural tailoring, fidelity/adherence to process) advance intervention effectiveness. Future studies should explore long-acting PrEP modalities and consider the impacts of social determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.