SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
Formal joint preparation appears to not be necessary for surgical treatment of ankle fractures with tibiotalocalcaneal nailing: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the editor on: "Formal joint preparation appears to not be necessary for surgical treatment of ankle fractures with tibiotalocalcaneal nailing: a systematic review".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to examine clinical outcomes among patients who underwent TTC nailing without any formal joint preparation to guide surgical decision-making.
methodsThis study was a systematic review using three databases queried through December 27th, 2025. Articles were included if they reported outcomes for at least one cohort of patients undergoing TTC nail for ankle fractures without formal joint preparation. Clinical outcomes examined included reported fracture union rates, complications (infection, hardware related, and amputation), as well as the need for reoperation.
resultsSeven articles were included out of 488 articles initially retrieved. Patients (n = 153) had a mean age of 73.8 (9.1) years old with a mean follow-up time of 22.2 (12.6) months. An overall fracture union rate of 85.7% was reported (n = 114 patients out of 133 patients). Studies reported a pooled total complication rate of 27.2% (n = 41 patients out of 151 patients), the most common being infection 17/34 (50%). Reoperation rates for unprepped TTC nailing was overall 17.4% (24/138), with only 1.5% of patients (2/138) reported across all studies requiring revision to formal ankle arthrodesis, suggesting treatment success irrespective of successful fusion.
conclusionTTC nailing without formal joint preparation may be a reasonable treatment option for ankle fractures in low demand patients with significant comorbidities, with minimal occurrence of reported nonunion requiring revision as well as the added benefit of minimizing incisions and wound complications. More research is needed for corroboration due to low evidence certainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.