ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Cross-Cultural Validation of the 11-Item Frommelt Attitude Toward the Care of the Dying Scale Among U.S. Preclinical Medical Students.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positive attitudes toward caring for dying patients are core competencies in medical education and particularly relevant to cancer education, where physicians must be prepared for communication, symptom management, and end-of-life decision-making. The Frommelt Attitude Toward the Care of the Dying (FATCOD) scale is widely used to assess these attitudes, yet the original 30-item version has shown psychometric limitations across cultures. This study examined the factorial structure and measurement properties of the FATCOD in the U.S. academic setting and tested the performance of an 11-item version previously validated in Italy. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among first- and second-year medical students at Loma Linda University School of Medicine (California, USA) during the 2024-2025 academic year. Participants completed the 30-item FATCOD online. Psychometric evaluation combined Principal Component Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis, and Rasch modeling using Partial Credit and Rating Scale Models. Among 295 respondents, the 30-item FATCOD showed modest internal consistency (α = 0.667) and poor structural fit, with neither PCA nor CFA supporting its hypothesized multidimensional structure. By contrast, the 11-item version (FATCOD-11) demonstrated satisfactory fit (CFI = 0.932; RMSEA = 0.056; SRMR = 0.043) and unidimensionality under Rasch analysis, with ordered thresholds and a Person Separation Index of 2.04, indicating discrimination across three levels of attitude. In this sample of U.S. medical students, the FATCOD-11 outperformed the original scale and appears to be a robust instrument for assessing attitudes toward end-of-life care and evaluating educational interventions in palliative and oncology care. Future research may expand this study to other countries or other health professionals dealing with end-of-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.