ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
A barrier-centered perspective on the gut-barrier-bone axis: a review of the core role of the intestinal barrier and related probiotics with nanocoatings.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a major public health problem characterized by reduced bone mass, deterioration of bone microarchitecture, and increased fracture risk. Growing evidence links the gut microbiota (GM) to bone remodeling, but the intestinal barrier is often treated as one component of microbiota-driven inflammation rather than as an interface that coordinates microbial, immune, endocrine, and nutritional signals. This review therefore adopts a barrier-centered perspective within the established gut-bone axis. We synthesize how epithelial, mucus, and immune barrier dysfunction may alter microbial products, immune-cell trafficking, gut-derived hormones, and nutrient handling, while distinguishing mechanistic evidence from association. Particular attention is given to Th17/Treg balance, macrophage responses, estrogen, serotonin, glucagon-like peptides, and mineral and vitamin absorption. We also critically evaluate nano-coated probiotics as a preclinical strategy to improve probiotic survival, mucosal retention, and barrier repair.This review adopts a barrier-centered perspective within the gut-bone axis and systematically summarizes the mechanisms through which the GM may influence the development and progression of OP via intestinal barrier dysfunction, with particular emphasis on immune dysregulation. Additionally, regarding novel intervention strategies for OP, this review specifically explores the technical advantages, mechanisms of action, and challenges in clinical translation of nano-coated probiotics. This review aims to provide a new theoretical framework and insights for research into the pathogenesis of OP, intervention strategies targeting the intestinal barrier, and clinical prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.