ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Ropinirole adjunct to methylphenidate versus placebo adjunct to methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current therapeutics for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have significant limitations, necessitating innovative therapies. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole, a dopamine agonist with anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties, as an add-on to methylphenidate for children with ADHD. In this eight-week, randomized, double-blind trial, 66 outpatients aged 6-17 with a diagnosis of ADHD were randomized to receive methylphenidate plus either ropinirole 0.25 mg or a matching placebo twice daily. ADHD-related symptoms were assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) reported by teachers and parents at baseline and weeks 4 and 8. Inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity subscale scores were also recorded. Additionally, adverse effects were monitored throughout the study. Data from 65 participants were used for analyses. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the arms. Significant time-by-treatment interaction was observed for the ADHD-RS-IV total scores as rated by teachers ([Formula: see text]= 0.051) and parents ([Formula: see text]= 0.153). The ropinirole group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in ADHD-RS-IV total scores from baseline to the endpoint as reported by teachers (Cohen's d = 0.530) and parents (Cohen's d = 0.504). Also, the ropinirole group achieved higher rates of response to treatment (69.7% versus 34.4%) and robust improvement (60.6% versus 25.0%). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable. In conclusion, methylphenidate + ropinirole was safe and beneficial compared to methylphenidate + placebo for reducing inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive, and total symptoms in children with ADHD. Further studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.