ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Neo-aortic Root Dilatation Following Ross Procedure in School-Aged Children.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neo-aortic root dilatation after the Ross procedure is well described in adults, and reinforced autograft techniques are used in this group, but data for children are limited. We aimed to identify the age at which the risk of dilatation begins to increase and to investigate whether an age or body surface area threshold exists. Patients treated between January 2006 and January 2025 at a single centre were reviewed retrospectively. Freedom from dilatation was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; associations with age and body surface area at operation were assessed by Cox regression. Of 96 children who underwent the Ross or Ross-Konno procedure, 68 had echocardiographic follow-up and 59 received free-standing autograft implantation (20 school-aged, 39 younger; median follow-up 6.9 years). Dilatation (Z-score ≥4) was documented in 6 of 20 school-aged (30.0%) and 4 of 39 younger children (10.3%), with incidence rates of 7.1 and 1.2 per 100 patient-years. School-aged patients had lower freedom from dilatation (log-rank p = 0.005), and each additional year of age increased the hazard of dilatation (hazard ratio 1.26, 95%CI 1.08-1.49; p = 0.003). Two patients required mechanical aortic valve replacement; none required reoperation for isolated dilatation, and there were no deaths among the 59 patients during follow-up. In our cohort, school-aged children appeared to carry a higher risk of neo-aortic root dilatation than children operated at younger ages. These findings suggest that closer echocardiographic surveillance may be appropriate in this group, and that extending reinforced autograft techniques below the adolescent threshold warrants prospective evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.