ArticlePsychological research2026
Designing for memory: how pathway configuration shapes long-term navigational representations.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSpatial memories undergo systems consolidation, typically transforming from flexible, hippocampal-dependent representations of spatial relations, to rigid, extra-hippocampal route representations. This study investigated whether environmental design influences this consolidation process to enhance long-term wayfinding.
methodsWe compared navigational performance in a virtual shopping centre featuring either a "Grid" configuration, which promotes flexible navigational representations, or a "Star" configuration, which encourages route-based sequence learning. In Experiment 1 (N = 66), participants were tested at 2 h and 2 weeks post-learning to assess repetition effects, while in Experiment 2 (N = 62), participants were tested only after 2 weeks to isolate time-dependent decay.
resultsResults demonstrated that the Star design supported superior retention after the two-week delay compared to the Grid design, and that repeated retrieval selectively enhanced performance in the Star design.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that architectural design fundamentally shapes the persistence of spatial memory by influencing the mechanisms engaged during learning and retrieval, offering a blueprint for environments that maximize long-term retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.