ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026
Clinical evaluation of nnU-Net-based segmentation for enhanced MRCP maximum intensity projection visualization.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether deep learning-based segmentation can improve visualization and diagnostic interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) maximum intensity projections (MIP) by suppressing overlapping high-intensity anatomy while preserving the pancreatobiliary system.
methodsA total of 322 3D MRCP datasets from 162 patients were included. The training set comprised 265 cases from 127 patients, allowing multiple acquisitions per patient, whereas the evaluation set consisted of 35 cases with a single acquisition per patient. A deep learning-based segmentation model was trained using manual annotations with three distinct labels: background, primary structures, and secondary structures. Conservative safety margins were applied to reduce segmentation omissions. Two board-certified radiologists independently rated processed and original MIP images using 4-point Likert scales (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction were used, and inter-reader agreement was assessed using linearly weighted Cohen's
resultsSegmentation suppressed obscuring structures and improved biliary visualization. After correction for multiple comparisons, processed images showed significantly improved structure overlap scores compared with original images (3.5 ± 0.9 vs. 2.5 ± 0.6) and higher diagnostic confidence (3.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 0.7).
conclusionsDeep learning-based segmentation improves MRCP MIP visualization by reducing anatomical overlap while preserving clinically relevant pancreatobiliary anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.