SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Navigare necesse est: The transorbital route to intraparenchymal temporal lesions.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the last years, the endoscopic transorbital approaches (ETOAs) have emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional microsurgical transcranial approaches (MTAs) for accessing selected intraparenchymal temporal lesions, particularly those located in the temporopolar (pTL) and mediobasal temporal regions (mbTR). While certain MTAs approaches with a lateral-to-medial trajectory toward the mesial temporal lobe may pose a higher risk of optic radiation injury and consequent visual field (VF) deficits, ETOAs offer an anterior-to-posterior trajectory that may minimize such risks. This systematic review aims to assess the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of ETOAs highlighting also the preservation of temporalis muscle integrity as an additional advantage of the transorbital approach. A systematic literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Scopus and Ovid MEDLINE to identify clinical studies evaluating ETOA for intraparenchymal temporal lesions. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies reporting clinical and/or surgical outcomes, including extent of resection (EoR), postoperative complications, and VF deficits. Descriptive statistics were applied. Additionally, illustrative clinical cases were reviewed to highlight technical nuances. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 41 patients. Most lesions were in the mbTR (87.8%), with a smaller number involving the temporal pole (12.2%). Gross total resection was achieved in 27 patients (73.0%), subtotal resection in 5 (13.5%), partial resection in 3 (8.1%), and biopsy alone in 2 (5.4%). Postoperative visual outcomes were favorable: of 29 patients with available data, 23 (79.3%) preserved their preoperative intact VF and none experienced postoperative VF deterioration. Complications were rare, with a single case (2.6%) of CSF leak and no instances of permanent cranial nerve deficits. Endoscopic transorbital route is a promising and versatile approach for selected intraparenchymal temporal lesions, offering a function-preserving alternative to conventional MTAs. Its anterior-to-posterior surgical corridor along the temporo-insular axis may facilitate reduced subcortical disruption, potentially allowing optic radiation sparing while preserving temporalis muscle integrity, further support its integration into neurosurgical practice. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.