Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42640330›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Understanding drivers of emergency department visits among patients from populations disproportionately affected by acute care use during cancer treatment: insights from qualitative interviews.

Jennifer Elston Lafata, Ethan Gibbons, Solomon Ayehu, Soroush Fariman, William A Wood, Jacob N Stein, Benyam Muluneh, Emily M Ray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer Elston LafataEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA. jel@email.unc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8550-6195
Ethan GibbonsUNC Health, Chapel Hill, USA.
Solomon AyehuEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Soroush FarimanEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
William A WoodLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Jacob N SteinLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Benyam MulunehEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Emily M RayLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency department (ED) visits are frequent during cancer treatment, burdensome for patients and caregivers, and disproportionately affect those from marginalized groups. While many such events may be preventable, rates in practice remain stubbornly high, and patient perspectives on the drivers of ED use remain underexplored, particularly among marginalized patients.

methodsWithin a quality improvement initiative aimed at reducing sociodemographic disparities in ED use, we conducted semi-structured interviews with adults receiving systemic anticancer therapy at a large academic medical center. Eligible participants were from marginalized populations with an ED visit within 30 days of treatment. Interviews explored symptom experiences, care-seeking decisions, and perceived barriers to outpatient support. Transcripts were analyzed using iterative thematic analysis to identify pathways to and underlying causes of ED presentation.

resultsAmong 11 eligible patients approached, 10 participated, all of whom were Black and/or Medicaid insured. Two pathways to ED presentation were identified: self-referral and referral by a health care professional. Underlying ED visit drivers, namely symptom onset or escalation accompanied by worry and uncertainty, barriers to accessing trusted clinical advice between visits, and limited effective self-management strategies, were consistent across pathways. Patients normalized treatment-related symptoms, relied on improvised self-management strategies, and sought guidance from informal advice networks, including family members and peers, which shaped their care-seeking decisions.

conclusionsPatient interviews revealed multiple, interrelated drivers of ED use during cancer treatment that extend beyond symptom severity alone. Findings identified multiple targets for improved supportive care processes and strategies to reduce preventable ED visits during cancer treatment.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementReferral and ConsultationUnited StatesAccessChemotherapyFamily caregiversIn-depth patient interviewsQuality improvementSelf-managementSymptomsUnplanned hospitalizations

Identifiers

PMID42640330
PMCPMC13506648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.