SynthesisRheumatology international2026
Prevalence and risk factors for burnout among rheumatologists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of burnout among rheumatologists. Medline and EMBASE were queried from inception until June 2026 for studies on burnout prevalence and/or risk factors in rheumatologists. Pooled prevalence was estimated with random effects meta-analysis, and risk factors for burnout were qualitatively assessed. A total of 12 studies were included, of which 7 prevalence studies (n=1342) were meta-analyzed that assessed burnout with the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory. The pooled prevalence of burnout was 51% (95%CI:39%-63%), emotional exhaustion 26% (95%CI: 18%-34%), depersonalization 20% (95%CI: 13%-28%), and low sense of personal accomplishment 31% (95%CI: 14%-51%). Findings were characterized by significant heterogeneity. Publication bias and subgroup analyses could not be performed. Individual risk factors for burnout included younger age, comorbidities, depression, lack of exercise, shorter years of practice/experience, and lower income in Latin America and the Middle East/North Africa. Work factors associated with burnout included longer work hours, practice types other than group practice, receiving phone calls from patients, being dissatisfied with the specialty, work, and rheumatology practice. More than half of rheumatologists have reported at least one dimension of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment). These findings emphasize the need to address burnout and its risk factors in rheumatologists. Institutions should prioritize strategies aimed at reducing workplace stressors and promoting rheumatologist well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.