ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Dose-response effect of aggressive MRI features and imaging subtypes in HCC early recurrence.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exhibits substantial early recurrence heterogeneity that current staging systems inadequately capture. We investigated whether gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI aggressive features exhibit a dose-response relationship with early recurrence and whether unsupervised clustering identifies distinct imaging subtypes with differential outcomes.
methodsThis retrospective study included 307 HCC patients from two centers (development: n = 245; validation: n = 62) who underwent preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI and curative hepatectomy. Nine aggressive MRI features were assessed. Dose-response analysis used Cochran-Armitage trend tests and Spearman correlation. K-means clustering was applied to derive imaging subtypes, with consistency validated via hierarchical clustering and Gaussian mixture models (adjusted Rand index). Predictive performance was compared with BCLC and CNLC staging using bootstrap-derived 95% confidence intervals for AUC differences.
resultsEarly recurrence occurred in 37.1% (114/307). Recurrence rates increased monotonically from 18.7% (0 features) to 79.6% (≥ 4 features; Spearman P = 0.413, P < 0.001; Cochran-Armitage Z = 7.547, P < 0.001). The MRI feature count achieved AUC 0.741 (95% CI 0.678-0.798), significantly outperforming BCLC staging (0.672; ΔAUC + 0.067, 95% CI + 0.011 to + 0.126). K-means clustering identified three subtypes: indolent (58.4%, recurrence 19.6%), aggressive (38.4%, 52.1%), and infiltrative (3.3%, 87.5%; 95% CI 62.5-100%; P < 0.001). Clustering consistency was confirmed (K-means vs. hierarchical: ARI = 0.505; NMI = 0.481). In multivariate analysis, the MRI count was independently predictive (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.29-1.97, P < 0.001) after adjustment for age, tumor size, AFP, and MVI. The dose-response trend was replicated in external validation (0 features: 33.3% → ≥4: 83.3%; AUC 0.642). In time-to-event analysis, 24-month recurrence-free survival decreased across risk tiers (78.4% to 20.4%; log-rank P < 0.001), and the feature count remained an independent predictor in Cox regression (HR 1.32 per feature, 95% CI 1.17-1.49, P < 0.001; C-index 0.738).
conclusionAggressive MRI features demonstrate a robust dose-response relationship with early HCC recurrence, fulfilling a key criterion for causal inference. Data-driven imaging subtypes provide prognostic stratification that complements existing staging systems, offering a simple and clinically interpretable framework for risk-adapted surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42640278What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.