ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Rapid/point-of-care syphilis testing in high-income countries: insights and implementation challenges from the authors' experience in Canada.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid/point-of-care tests (RPOCTs) for syphilis can significantly contribute to addressing the ongoing syphilis epidemic in high-income countries (HICs) for individuals facing barriers to traditional healthcare access and who may be less likely to return for follow-up appointments. By providing immediate diagnosis and treatment, RPOCT helps reduce disease progression and transmission to sex partners and from pregnant women to their fetus. This review offers an overview of the resurgence of syphilis in HICs and discusses the advantages and limitations of existing RPOCTs. We also share our experience with implementing RPOCT programs and emphasize the importance of successful implementation, which requires a strategic approach that considers RPOCT performance characteristics, local epidemiology, and the specific needs of each setting. Community members and site leaders should be involved in program planning and implementation to ensure they are rooted in the lived experiences and knowledge of those most impacted. Equally important is engaging policymakers, public health authorities, and laboratories to support program adoption and sustainability. Patient, healthcare provider, and laboratory acceptance of RPOCT is crucial when selecting test kits and planning program delivery. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation are essential to assess program effectiveness and allow for strategic adjustments based on feedback and outcomes. This continuous improvement process optimizes the impact of RPOCT initiatives and maximizes public health efforts. Further research is needed to explore existing and new technologies that can enhance the accuracy of diagnosing syphilis infections and cost-effectiveness studies to support their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.