ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2026
Precomputed grid potential (PGP) method: Exact reciprocal-space acceleration of particle mesh Ewald for Monte Carlo simulations.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When conducting Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using a fixed or infrequently updated charge environment, each insertion or deletion of a particle requires an O(N log N) particle mesh Ewald (PME) long-range electrostatics calculation. To address this, we have developed Precomputed Grid Potential (PGP). This approach is a mathematically exact redesign of the smoothed PME (SPME) stationary-mobile reciprocal cross-term, which has an O(1) reciprocal-space cost in the stationary region size per insertion and achieves no loss of accuracy when compared to the discrete SPME calculation using the same mesh. After precomputing the static contribution of the stationary charges on a 3D grid employing a B-spline interpolation operator, particle insertions only require O(1) interpolations of the stationary potential and not a Fourier transform. The PGP and PME cross-terms are algebraically the same, and the only source of numerical variation between them is the position-dependent mesh self-artifact included in discrete PME. This is eliminated by construction in PGP's cross-term formulation. We have compared PGP to PME for water sampling in protein systems of up to 56K atoms, showing through grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations that, after independent calibration of the chemical potential, all distribution measurements, including mean occupancy and interaction energy, were statistically indistinguishable, while accept/reject ratios differed by no more than 0.23%. For these fixed-stationary region GCMC workloads, PGP reduces the per-trial reciprocal-space cost (4678× to 9857×) at an identical SPME Hamiltonian, mesh size, and order of B-spline.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.