SynthesisAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2026
Inclusion of Participants With Limited English Proficiency in Autism Research.
Synthesis in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and limited English proficiency (LEP), defined as having limited ability to read, write, or understand English, may experience disparities in quality of care and healthcare outcomes. However, little research has described methods and practices for including participants with LEP in ASD research studies. This literature review study investigated (1) the prevalence of LEP inclusion in U.S. research about ASD, (2) the languages included, and (3) the communication methods between research teams and participants with LEP. Using the Covidence Systematic Review Software, we completed a two-round screening of 1007 studies published between 2013 and June 2025 in four major autism journals: Autism, Autism Research, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, and Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. We limited the sample to U.S.-based original research involving human subjects with ASD and/or their caretakers. Eligible studies were reviewed further to extract relevant study information (e.g., participant demographics, study type, communication methods, and inclusion of LEP participants). Only 61 (19%) among the 326 eligible studies explicitly mentioned the inclusion of participants with LEP and provided information about their inclusion. Other studies may have included LEP participants but did not report their inclusion in the publication. The most common language included was Spanish. Results showed that the most used oral and written communication methods involved communication with, and translation of study materials by a bilingual research team member. The results suggest that LEP participants were underrepresented in ASD research, and future research is needed to advise more inclusive healthcare practices and policies for children and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.