ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
A Bayesian Spatiotemporal Model for Joint Estimation of Brain Activation and Connectivity in fMRI Studies.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments play a crucial role in modern data-driven neuroscience research. These studies often aim to understand how external stimuli trigger activation in specific brain regions and to explore functional connectivity patterns among predefined regions, commonly referred to as regions of interest (ROIs). Accurately estimating both brain activation and inter-regional connectivity is challenging due to complex spatiotemporal correlations and low signal-to-noise ratios inherent in fMRI data. This paper introduces a joint spatiotemporal Bayesian framework that simultaneously models activation and connectivity across multiple subjects while estimating the hemodynamic response function (HRF) for each region. Spatial dependencies are captured via an unweighted graph-Laplacian prior on regression and autoregressive coefficients, and region-specific random effects are modeled using a Bayesian Gaussian graphical model to reflect connectivity among ROIs. We evaluate the performance of the model through simulation studies, demonstrating robust estimation under realistic low signal-to-noise conditions. The approach is then applied to a multisubject motor task dataset from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), mapping brain motor areas associated with specific movements (e.g., finger, toe, tongue) and assessing their activation and lateralization in response to visual cues. The model is further evaluated on the Individual Brain Charting (IBC) dataset, a high-resolution 3T fMRI dataset designed for fine-grained cognitive mapping across multiple tasks. Finally, the model is validated through comparisons with the classical general linear model (GLM), which is commonly used in the neuroscience community, highlighting the advantages of our Bayesian approach in jointly capturing activation and connectivity patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.