ArticleInternational journal of psychiatry in medicine2026
Feasibility, Safety, and Exploratory Outcomes of Methylphenidate for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke.
Article in International journal of psychiatry in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
ObjectivePosttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is prevalent among veterans and is associated with increased stroke risk. This study examined the feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of methylphenidate (MPH) for reducing PTSD symptom severity and improving functional outcomes among veterans with pre-existing PTSD recovering from stroke.MethodsA randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 pilot trial was conducted at a Veterans Affairs medical center. Veterans aged 40-75 years with ischemic stroke and pre-existing PTSD were randomized 1:1 to receive MPH or placebo for 12 weeks followed by a 2-week taper. The outcomes included clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5), self-reported PTSD symptoms with the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), global functional disability via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and stroke-related quality of life and function measured by the Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16). Between-group differences in change scores were evaluated using two-sample tests.ResultsTwenty veterans were enrolled (mean age 63.7 years; 95% male). Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. CAPS-5 and PCL-5 scores decreased over time in both groups, with no significant between-group differences, although greater reductions were observed in the MPH group at multiple time points. Both groups demonstrated modest improvements in functional outcomes, with trends toward greater gains in cognitive and participation-related domains among participants receiving MPH. MPH was generally well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns observed.ConclusionMPH was feasible and generally well tolerated. Exploratory analyses suggested possible improvements in selected cognitive and recovery-related domains that warrant confirmation in adequately powered studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.