ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Experiences of beginner runners on a modified Couch-to-5k programme: a qualitative exploration.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite widespread recognition of the importance of physical activity in reducing the risk of chronic disease and high level of awareness and engagement with the Couch-to-5k programme, adherence to beginner running programmes remains low. Little is known about the experiences of 'completers' and effective approaches to improve and sustain engagement. This study explores the experiences of individuals completing a modified Couch-to-5k running programme, with particular focus on motivation, mental wellbeing, physical health, and injury perceptions. Grounded in an interpretivist paradigm, this qualitative study conducted five semi-structured focus groups with 33 participants who completed a 9-week programme incorporating weekly instructor-led group sessions alongside independent runs. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Four overarching themes were identified: programme motivation, mental health and wellbeing, perceived physical impact, and injury knowledge. Motivation evolved from individual health goals initially to a reliance on social support, with group-based, structured delivery enhancing accountability and adherence. Participants reported significant psychological benefits, including improved mood, self-efficacy, and social connectedness, alongside an emotional progression from anxiety to enjoyment. These benefits permeated wider cumulatively improving fitness, sleep, and health behaviours, despite initial discomfort and adaptation challenges. While no serious injuries were reported, minor issues highlighted the importance of pacing and body awareness, alongside gaps in injury-related knowledge. Findings suggest that socially supported, structured running programmes enhance adherence, while improving self-efficacy, physical health, and mental wellbeing. Integrating social components and injury education into future public health physical activity initiatives may improve engagement, reduce attrition, and promote sustained behaviour change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.