Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639687›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Stage-Specific Temporal Trends in Treatment Patterns and Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer: A Multicentre Real-World Cohort Study From KAMU-ON.

Hiroaki Iwamoto, Kouji Izumi, Kazuaki Machioka, Ren Toriumi, Takashi Shima, Masakazu Nozaki, Tomohiro Hori, Takahiro Inaba, Ryunosuke Nakagawa, Taiki Kamijima and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Hiroaki IwamotoDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3599-2217
Kouji IzumiDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8480-9100
Kazuaki MachiokaDepartment of Urology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Ren ToriumiDepartment of Urology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Takashi ShimaDepartment of Urology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Masakazu NozakiDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3829-6544
Tomohiro HoriDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0355-1005
Takahiro InabaDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9449-5421
Ryunosuke NakagawaDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-8908
Taiki KamijimaDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2553-0497
Suguru KadomotoDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4136-8998
Tomoyuki MakinoDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2554-7048
Renato NaitoDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3936-7235
Hiroshi YaegashiDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-8834
Kazuyoshi ShigeharaDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-9135
Takahiro NoharaDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-2068
Tohru MiyagiDepartment of Urology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Chikashi SetoDepartment of Urology, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Yoshifumi KadonoDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Fukui, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5780-4032
Atsushi MizokamiDepartment of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5643-2182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate stage-specific temporal trends in treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) among patients with prostate cancer in a Japanese multicentre cohort.

methodsThis multicentre retrospective cohort study used data from the Kaga Million Uro-Oncology Network (KAMU-ON) registry. Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2010 and 2024 were categorized as localized, nonmetastatic advanced, or metastatic disease. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinically relevant covariates. Additional analyses with follow-up administratively restricted at 48 months were performed.

resultsA total of 7140 patients with defined disease stage and available survival data were included, comprising 5048 patients with localized disease, 1128 with nonmetastatic advanced disease, and 964 with metastatic disease. Treatment patterns changed substantially across diagnostic eras. Survival improvement appeared most evident in metastatic disease, whereas temporal differences were less apparent in nonmetastatic advanced disease. In multivariable Cox analyses, later diagnostic eras were associated with lower hazards of death in the overall cohort (2014-2017: HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.08; 2018-2024: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98). Formal interaction testing did not demonstrate statistically significant effect modification according to disease stage (p = 0.163).

conclusionsTemporal survival trends in prostate cancer appeared to vary across disease stages in this Japanese multicentre cohort. Survival improvement appeared most evident in metastatic disease, whereas changes were less pronounced in nonmetastatic advanced disease. These findings suggest that therapeutic advances may not uniformly translate into survival gains across prostate cancer disease states.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansJapanKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateTime FactorsJapanoverall survivalprostate cancerreal‐world datatemporal trendstreatment patterns

Identifiers

PMID42639687
PMCPMC13504631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.