Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639594›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2026

Favorable Adherence and Tolerability of Letermovir Versus Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged 65 y or Older: Findings From a Randomized, Phase 3 Trial.

Suphamai Bunnapradist, Flavio Vincenti, Oliver Witzke, Stefan Schneeberger, M Hong Nguyen, Natalya Broyde, Christopher L Gilbert, Barbara Haber

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03443869 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-8228), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03443869 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MK-8228 (Letermovir) Versus Valganciclovir for the Prevention of Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Disease in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2018 to 2022Enrolled601ConditionsCMV DiseaseArmsLetermovir, Valganciclovir, Acyclovir (ACV), Placebo to ACV, Placebo to LET
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suphamai BunnapradistDivision of Kidney Transplantation, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1668-2005
Flavio VincentiDivision of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA.
Oliver WitzkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Nephrology, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, University Medicine Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Stefan SchneebergerDepartment of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
M Hong NguyenDepartment of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Natalya BroydeMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ.
Christopher L GilbertMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ.
Barbara HaberMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older patients undergoing kidney transplantation are at risk of perioperative complications, underscoring the need for optimized care. The number of kidney transplants in older adults has increased in the past decade, with greater reliance on transplants from deceased donors. Methods: The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled P002 study evaluated 200 d of letermovir versus valganciclovir prophylaxis in cytomegalovirus-seronegative kidney transplant recipients who received kidneys from cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors. Outcomes among participants aged 65 y or older are reported. Results: Forty-eight and 55 participants aged 65 y or older received letermovir or valganciclovir, respectively. A lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir versus valganciclovir had committee-confirmed cytomegalovirus disease through week 52 posttransplant (9% versus 22%; stratum-adjusted difference, -12% [95% confidence interval [CI], -27% to 2%]), without significant differences in cytomegalovirus disease or viremia between groups. A significantly higher percentage of participants receiving letermovir had ≥90% prophylaxis adherence (96% [95% CI, 86%-100%] versus 49% [95% CI, 35%-63%]). The letermovir group showed numerically lower incidences of drug-related adverse events (25% versus 49%) and study medication discontinuations due to adverse events (10% versus 20%). A significantly lower percentage of participants receiving letermovir had leukopenia or neutropenia events through week 28 posttransplant (31% [95% CI, 19%-46%] versus 62% [95% CI, 48%-75%]). Participants receiving letermovir had numerically lower rates of opportunistic infections (11% versus 25%) and rehospitalizations (51% versus 69%) through week 52 posttransplant. Conclusions: Letermovir showed substantial advantages over valganciclovir in adherence, safety, and tolerability, supporting its use as an important option for cytomegalovirus disease prophylaxis for older patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Clinical trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03443869.

Identifiers

PMID42639594
PMCPMC13502855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.