Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639568›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2026

Towards an active inference account of deep meditative deconstruction.

Shawn Prest, Kevin Berryman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shawn PrestMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, 29 Ancora Imparo Way, Clayton, Victoria, 3163, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7861-8347
Kevin BerrymanMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, 29 Ancora Imparo Way, Clayton, Victoria, 3163, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-032X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the intersection of the deep meditative deconstruction resulting from Buddhist meditative practice, specifically through the defabrication process, with the active inference framework (AIF). We propose that defabrication, central to Buddhist meditation, can be understood as a computational process whereby the repeated release of mental tension-associated with clinging and aversion-drives inference progressively lower in an agent's hierarchical generative model. By casting the release of mental tension as a reduction in hierarchical level-specific precision over beliefs about hidden causes, we demonstrate how the phenomenology of defabrication naturally arises from the resultant system dynamics. This approach enables a computational interpretation of Buddhist meditative states, such as the jhānas, and core concepts like equanimity and stillness. More broadly, it advances a computational phenomenology of meditative deconstruction. Finally, we illustrate the deconstruction process under AIF by extending it to the cessation of phenomenal experience, suggesting this offers insight into core-knowledge structuring and the generation of experience.

Indexed as

active inferenceBuddhistcessationconsciousnessdeconstructiondefabricationmeditationphenomenology

Identifiers

PMID42639568
PMCPMC13502408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.