Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639549›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026

Clinical Evaluation of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline.

Zhijun Guo, Yunhui Zhang, Haoyun Chen, Xinyi Dong, Weicheng Lei, Luhua Zhong, Jiali Yang, Huanjun Huang, Zhuojia Chen, Weiting Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhijun Guo *Department of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yunhui Zhang *Department of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Haoyun ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xinyi DongSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510006, People's Republic of China.
Weicheng LeiDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Luhua ZhongDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Jiali YangDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Huanjun HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Zhuojia ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0343-3795
Weiting LiangDepartment of Pharmacy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of ALK inhibitors, based on A Quick Guideline for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (the Second Edition). Methods: According to the 2nd edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Micromedex, and Medlive, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for specific drug information. We systematically evaluated eight ALK inhibitors marketed in China for pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method. Results: The ranking of ALK inhibitors was derived from a structured scoring framework based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline. The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were alectinib (78.70 points), lorlatinib (78.70 points), brigatinib (78.50 points), ensartinib (73.30 points), iruplinalkib (72.55 points), ceritinib (71.50 points), envonalkib (71.15 points), crizotinib (70.60 points). Conclusion: Based on the second edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline and combined with the clinical application characteristics of ALK inhibitors, this study performed a multidimensional scoring of eight ALK inhibitors. The evaluation results could provide a reference for medical institutions in the introduction and elimination of ALK inhibitors.

Indexed as

Anaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsChinaHumansALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase Inhibitorsanaplastic lymphoma kinaseclinical applicationdrug evaluationnon-small cell lung cancertyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42639549
PMCPMC13502460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.