ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
Clinical Evaluation of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a reference for healthcare organizations in the selection and rational use of ALK inhibitors, based on A Quick Guideline for Drug Evaluation and Selection in Chinese Medical Institutions (the Second Edition). Methods: According to the 2nd edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline released in 2023, relevant databases such as PubMed, Micromedex, and Medlive, drug labels, and clinical guidelines were searched for specific drug information. We systematically evaluated eight ALK inhibitors marketed in China for pharmacological properties, efficacy, safety, economy, and other attributes using a percentage scoring method. Results: The ranking of ALK inhibitors was derived from a structured scoring framework based on the 2nd Edition of China's Drug Evaluation and Selection Guideline. The final assessment result scores from highest to lowest were alectinib (78.70 points), lorlatinib (78.70 points), brigatinib (78.50 points), ensartinib (73.30 points), iruplinalkib (72.55 points), ceritinib (71.50 points), envonalkib (71.15 points), crizotinib (70.60 points). Conclusion: Based on the second edition of China's drug evaluation and selection guideline and combined with the clinical application characteristics of ALK inhibitors, this study performed a multidimensional scoring of eight ALK inhibitors. The evaluation results could provide a reference for medical institutions in the introduction and elimination of ALK inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.