ArticleNature and science of sleep2026
Prevalence and Determinants of Bed-Sharing Among Infants and Toddlers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bed-sharing is a prevalent but contested sleep practice with important child safety implications. Population-specific data from Saudi Arabia remain limited among children aged up to four years. Objective: To determine the prevalence of bed-sharing among infants and toddlers in Jeddah, identify associated factors, and examine its relationship with sleep outcome. Methods: This cross-sectional study used consecutive sampling to enrol 437 children aged one month to four years at primary healthcare centres and paediatric clinics affiliated with King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, between September 2025 and January 2026. Sleep data, collected using the Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire-Revised Short Form (BISQ-R-SF), were analysed using the Mann-Whitney Results: Bed-sharing prevalence was 87.2%. Exclusive breastfeeding was independently associated with lower bed-sharing odds ratios (multivariate OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25-0.80; p = 0.007). The receipt of safe sleep counselling was paradoxically associated with higher odds of bed-sharing (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.03-3.47; p = 0.042). Most sleep parameters were similar between groups; however, the sleep problem score was higher among non-bed-sharing children [median 3 (IQR 2) vs 2 (IQR 2); p = 0.039]. Sleep consolidation improved progressively with age. Conclusion: Bed-sharing was highly prevalent among young Saudi children but was not associated with worse sleep outcomes in this cohort; sleep consolidation instead improved with age in both bed-sharing and non-bed-sharing children. Because the cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, counselling should be culturally sensitive, behaviorally grounded, and focused on modifiable risk practices rather than bed-sharing status alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.