ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2026
A Clinical Analysis and Classification Prediction of 145 Cases of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Clinical Analysis and Classification Prediction of 145 Cases of Abdominal Wall Endometriosis.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 145 patients with abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE) secondary to cesarean section and to identify clinical indicators for predicting lesion classification. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. We analyzed the general data and surgical details of 145 patients with AWE secondary to cesarean section, comparing three subtypes based on lesion invasion depth (Type I: subcutaneous fat; Type II: rectus muscle; Type III: peritoneal), two lesion patterns (solitary vs. multiple), and recurrence status. Results: Transverse incisions comprised 67.6% of cases, with higher implantation rates at the right end. Longitudinal incisions showed predominance at the lower end (66%). Type III patients were older and had longer operative times, greater blood loss, and larger lesions than Types I/II (all Conclusion: In post-cesarean AWE, Type III lesions are associated with greater surgical complexity. MRI provides superior preoperative classification accuracy compared to ultrasound. An age at menarche ≤ 13.5 years is a significant predictor for multiple AWE lesions, offering a valuable tool for preoperative risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.