ArticleJournal of marriage and the family2026
Introducing the
Article in Journal of marriage and the family, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To describe the research design and sample of the Future of Families Third Generation (FFG3) study, which is collecting data on the third generation of the Future of Families and Child Wellbeing (FF) study. Background: Research on the intergenerational transmission of health and socioeconomic status (SES) has been limited by a paucity of prospective multigenerational studies with infant health in two generations. Method: The FFG3 study is enrolling children of the original 1998-2000 FF birth cohort, who are now young adults (second generation, G2), and collecting perinatal data and biological samples. We provide background, describe the research design and sample, and present data on 349 G2 mothers who had children by age 26 and 558 of their G3 children. We compare characteristics of this recent cohort to those of the previous generation of early childbearing mothers (G1) and their G2 children. Results: The recent cohort of mothers and their children born ~25 years after the original study began is much more disadvantaged than the original cohort. Physical and mental health of G2 mothers was worse than that of the G1s, as was the health of their infants. The proportion of marital births has not changed appreciably across generations (11% in FFG3, 12% in FF), but a much higher proportion of G2 mothers reported that the other parent was unknown (15%, versus 1%). Conclusion: The FFG3 study will facilitate novel and important analyses of intergenerational transmission of health and SES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.