Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Ritualized relational autonomy in Chinese end-of-life care: balancing Confucian benevolence and individual rights.

Xun Ma, Zepin Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xun MaSchool of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zepin LinDepartment of Philosophy, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article develops a hypothesis-and-theory framework for ethical tensions in contemporary Chinese end-of-life care and family mourning. It examines the relationship between Confucian ren'ai (benevolence), expressed through embodied familial care, and modern rights-based commitments to bodily autonomy, dignity, and informed choice. The article offers a conceptual and normative analysis informed by interpretive cultural inquiry and existing empirical research on family-centered decision-making, advance care planning, caregiver burden, and hospice and palliative care in China. It argues that the body is the key site at which benevolence and rights intersect: in Confucian ethics, the body is the medium of care, devotion, and mourning, while in modern bioethics it is the bearer of autonomy and consent. On this basis, the article proposes a framework of ritualized relational autonomy, structured through three stages: care agreements, family meetings, and care-termination rituals. This framework aims to prevent benevolent care from hardening into unlimited liability while also avoiding an atomized model of autonomy detached from family life. The article further argues that this framework has practical significance for public health ethics in aging societies by clarifying how family care, patient dignity, caregiver support, and bereavement may be more effectively coordinated under contemporary Chinese conditions.

Indexed as

BeneficenceCeremonial BehaviorConfucianismPersonal AutonomyRelational AutonomyTerminal CareChinaDecision MakingEast Asian PeopleHumansbodily autonomyend-of-life carefamily mourningren’ai (benevolence)ritualized relational autonomy

Identifiers

PMID42639504
PMCPMC13501961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.