ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Ritualized relational autonomy in Chinese end-of-life care: balancing Confucian benevolence and individual rights.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article develops a hypothesis-and-theory framework for ethical tensions in contemporary Chinese end-of-life care and family mourning. It examines the relationship between Confucian ren'ai (benevolence), expressed through embodied familial care, and modern rights-based commitments to bodily autonomy, dignity, and informed choice. The article offers a conceptual and normative analysis informed by interpretive cultural inquiry and existing empirical research on family-centered decision-making, advance care planning, caregiver burden, and hospice and palliative care in China. It argues that the body is the key site at which benevolence and rights intersect: in Confucian ethics, the body is the medium of care, devotion, and mourning, while in modern bioethics it is the bearer of autonomy and consent. On this basis, the article proposes a framework of ritualized relational autonomy, structured through three stages: care agreements, family meetings, and care-termination rituals. This framework aims to prevent benevolent care from hardening into unlimited liability while also avoiding an atomized model of autonomy detached from family life. The article further argues that this framework has practical significance for public health ethics in aging societies by clarifying how family care, patient dignity, caregiver support, and bereavement may be more effectively coordinated under contemporary Chinese conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.