ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2026
Exploring the possibilities and limitations of climate-smart agriculture for SDG 2 in West Africa.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change continues to exacerbate food insecurity across West Africa, posing a major threat to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 2 (SDG 2: Zero Hunger). Despite the multifarious interventions implemented to mitigate its effects, climate vagaries such as floods, erratic weather patterns, droughts, and farmer-herder conflict, as well as weak policy implementation, have coincided with continued population growth, thereby worsening food insecurity in the sub-region. This study examines the possibilities and limitations of engaging climate-smart technologies to achieve SDG 2 in West Africa. The study utilized secondary data sources with the aid of a qualitative methodology grounded in an integrative review, guided by the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The study narrowed its analysis to 85 relevant studies retrieved from electronic databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost. The entire body of literature on the research was synthesized and consolidated through three theoretical frameworks: Climate Resilience Theory, the Sustainable Food Systems (SFS) Framework, and Agricultural Innovation Diffusion Theory. Findings indicate that while climate-smart agriculture (CSA) recorded a wide range of successes in countries such as Mali, Ghana, Nigeria, Senegal, and Burkina Faso, its adoption rates were notably low in the sub-continent due to the challenges of technological know-how, illiteracy, and weak government policies, among other factors. We concluded that achieving SDG 2 requires a holistic ecosystem approach that integrates digital literacy and climate-smart outputs into regional initiatives such as the WAICSA framework, strengthens regional cooperation, and encourages culturally sensitive technologies to mitigate the sub-region's vulnerability to persistent food deficit fueled by a worsening climate trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.