ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Development and internal evaluation of an interpretable machine learning model based on clinical and radiomics features to differentiate lower extremity arterial embolism from atherothrombosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate differentiation between lower extremity arterial embolism (AE) and atherothrombosis is essential. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model combining clinical and radiomics features for preoperative non-invasive diagnosis. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with lower extremity AE or atherothrombosis admitted to the Department of Vascular Surgery at our institution between January 2018 and January 2025. Clinical data were collected through the electronic medical record system, and radiomics features were extracted from lower extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) images. Based on these features, three ML models were constructed, comprising a clinical model, a radiomics model, and a combined clinical-radiomics model. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Furthermore, clinical utility was validated using calibration curves and decision curve analysis, while model interpretation was conducted via the SHAP method. Results: Among the three predictive models, the fusion model demonstrated the optimal differential diagnostic performance. In the testing set, this model yielded an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI 0.718-0.924), with sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy of 0.750, 0.714, 0.761, and 0.734, respectively; the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) were 2.62 and 0.35. In the training set, its AUC reached 0.979 (95% CI 0.959-0.999), with sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy of 0.940, 0.939, 0.946, and 0.940, respectively; the LR+ and LR- were 15.41 and 0.06. Discussion: The clinical-radiomics fusion model demonstrates potential as a non-invasive auxiliary tool to assist in differentiating lower extremity atherothrombosis from AE in a single-center setting, warranting prospective multicenter validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.