ArticleCureus2026
Effect of Connector Cross-Sectional Geometry on Fracture Resistance of Three-Unit Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Under Vertical and Oblique Loading: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe long-term success of monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses depends not only on the mechanical properties of zirconia but also on the biomechanical design of the connector region. Although connector dimensions have been extensively investigated, limited evidence is available regarding the influence of connector cross-sectional geometry on fracture resistance in different loading directions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of round, triangular, and square connector cross-sectional geometries on the fracture resistance of three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses under vertical and oblique loading conditions. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis in vitro study included 48 three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using a standardized computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing workflow. The specimens were equally distributed into three connector design groups (round, triangular, and square), each further subdivided according to the vertical and oblique loading conditions (n = 8). The connector cross-sectional area was standardized at 9 mm² in all specimens, with the connector geometry serving as the only experimental variable. Following cementation onto the standardized resin dies, fracture resistance testing was performed using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until catastrophic failure. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's post-hoc test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe round connector demonstrated the highest mean fracture resistance under both vertical (1451.50 ± 132.84 N) and oblique (1151.25 ± 166.70 N) loading conditions. One-way analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences among the connector designs under vertical (F = 16.50, p < 0.001) and oblique loading (F = 3.82, p = 0.038). Post-hoc analysis showed that the round connector exhibited significantly greater fracture resistance than both the triangular and square connectors under vertical loading, whereas under oblique loading, a significant difference was observed only between the round and square connector designs.
conclusionThe connector cross-sectional geometry significantly affected the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses. The round connector demonstrated superior mechanical performance under both loading conditions, suggesting that rounded connector configurations may improve the structural reliability and durability of posterior zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.