ArticleERJ open research2026
Air pollution and respiratory health: a multinational needs assessment of physicians.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Air pollution is a major threat to human health globally, but physicians' awareness of its specific health impacts and the extent they educate patients remain poorly understood. Methods: We sought out the perceptions of general practitioners and pulmonologists regarding their role in managing impacts of air pollution on patients. We also assessed the educational and behavioural gaps, and contextual challenges relevant to respiratory health management from these professional perspectives. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted across eight countries (Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Mexico and the United States) with 600 physicians (primary care and respiratory medicine specialties). Results: While 95% of respondents agreed that it was their role to assess and manage air pollution exposure and proactively educate patients, fewer reported concrete demonstrations of this role in practice. Over half (55%) recommended medical treatment addressing exposure, and 20% engaged in normal monitoring but without preventive action for patients exposed to air pollution. Only 11% recommended concrete lifestyle changes for patients. In addition, 34% of respondents were unsure whether they should prioritise only acute cases for counselling. Significant country differences in awareness of air pollution health impacts and management were found. Inadequate integration of air quality indices in patient care and costly protective equipment were identified as systemic barriers. Conclusion: Although general practitioners and pulmonologists recognise their role in assessing, managing and educating patients about air pollution exposure, their perception of this role and competencies within it indicate the need for educational support translating to impactful practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.