Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639365›Full record

ReviewChemical science2026

Transfer learning for reaction optimisation: overview of its applications and limits.

Aravind Senthil Vel, Maxime Llobet, Thibaud Mabit, François-Xavier Felpin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aravind Senthil VelNantes Université, CNRS, CEISAM, UMR 6230 F-44000 Nantes France thibaud.mabit@univ-nantes.fr fx.felpin@univ-nantes.fr https://felpin.univ-nantes.fr/.
Maxime LlobetNantes Université, CNRS, CEISAM, UMR 6230 F-44000 Nantes France thibaud.mabit@univ-nantes.fr fx.felpin@univ-nantes.fr https://felpin.univ-nantes.fr/.
Thibaud MabitNantes Université, CNRS, CEISAM, UMR 6230 F-44000 Nantes France thibaud.mabit@univ-nantes.fr fx.felpin@univ-nantes.fr https://felpin.univ-nantes.fr/.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7069-427X
François-Xavier FelpinNantes Université, CNRS, CEISAM, UMR 6230 F-44000 Nantes France thibaud.mabit@univ-nantes.fr fx.felpin@univ-nantes.fr https://felpin.univ-nantes.fr/.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8851-246X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction optimisation remains a critical yet resource-intensive step in chemical synthesis and process development, particularly in complex, multidimensional reaction spaces. Recent advances in automated experimentation and machine-learning-guided optimisation have significantly improved the efficiency of identifying optimal reaction conditions. However, most optimisation campaigns still operate in a cold-start regime, failing to exploit the growing body of historical experimental data. In this Review, we examine the emerging role of transfer learning as a strategy to overcome this limitation by enabling the reuse of knowledge from related reactions or prior optimisation campaigns. We provide a comprehensive overview of transfer learning methodologies applied to reaction optimisation, including multi-task Bayesian optimisation, ensemble approaches, neural-process-based models, hybrid artificial intelligence frameworks, and active transfer learning strategies. Through selected case studies, we highlight how these approaches can accelerate convergence, reduce experimental effort, and improve data efficiency, particularly in automated and flow chemistry platforms. We further discuss key challenges, including the risk of negative transfer, the difficulty of defining reaction similarity, and the need for chemically meaningful representations. Finally, we outline future directions toward knowledge-accumulating autonomous laboratories, where transfer learning enables cumulative chemical learning across reaction systems.

Identifiers

PMID42639365
PMCPMC13501379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.