Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639364›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Folie à deux as a cusp catastrophe in coupled active inference: a dynamical systems account of shared psychotic disorder.

Dustin Beasley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dustin BeasleySchool of Psychology, Golden Gate University, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior work in computational psychiatry has identified three failure modes of precision weighting that produce the phenomenology of individual-level psychosis: aberrant precision on priors, aberrant precision on sensory likelihood, and aberrant meta-precision. The coupled, dyadic case has remained outside this framework. We identify a fourth failure mode, dyadic precision migration, in which precision migrates from individual sensory and prior channels onto the coupling channel under conditions of external precision collapse and sustained allostatic load. Mode 4 is a supervenient property of the coupled information geometry and is undefined in the decoupled limit; it is invisible to single-agent models of psychosis. Folie à deux, or shared psychotic disorder, is the canonical clinical instance. Starting from coupled active inference, we derive the reduced order-parameter dynamics via Landau theory expansion and show that asymmetric coupling unfolds the symmetric pitchfork bifurcation into the cusp catastrophe normal form. The bifurcation parameter maps to coupling stiffness; the symmetry-breaking parameter maps to coupling asymmetry. Numerical simulations confirm the characteristic semicubical parabola bifurcation geometry and establish that the shared attractor regime is robust (17.8% to 23.4% of explored parameter space) across coupling functional forms and noise distributions. Hysteresis on the cusp manifold predicts a falsifiable ordering of recovery times by the depth to which the secondary's beliefs are reconfigured: shallow (inference-dominated) cases recover quickly on separation, deep (learning-dominated) cases recover slowly, and cases reflecting two independent pathologies do not remit on separation alone. The framework yields a transdiagnostic account of dyadic delusional convergence and clarifies why folie à deux is structurally rare without requiring rare etiological ingredients.

Indexed as

active inferencecomputational psychiatrycusp catastrophedyadic psychopathologydynamical systemsfolie à deuxnetwork physiologyprecision weighting

Identifiers

PMID42639364
PMCPMC13501271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.