ReviewRSC advances2026
A comprehensive review of methods for valorisation and production of bioproducts from various cassava wastes.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cassava is a key tropical crop; however, its processing generates large volumes of residues, including peels, bagasse, leaves, stems, and wastewater. Although these wastes are rich in starch, fibre, and lignocellulosic components with high biotechnological potential, they remain largely underutilised. In this context, this review examines current strategies for the recovery and valorisation of cassava processing residues, encompassing physical, chemical, biological, and enzymatic pretreatments, as well as emerging technologies aimed at biofuel and bioproduct generation. Hydrothermal pretreatment stands out for offering a balanced performance between efficiency and inhibitor formation, while acid pretreatment maximises hemicellulose solubilisation but generates higher levels of toxic compounds. Alkaline pretreatments promote effective delignification and enhance enzymatic accessibility, albeit producing effluents that require further treatment. Biological and enzymatic approaches present environmental advantages and low inhibitor formation, although their application is limited by slower kinetics. Emerging technologies, such as ultrasound and non-thermal plasma, show promising potential to enhance sugar release and reduce hydrolysate toxicity, despite the limited number of studies specifically focused on cassava residues. Overall, the integration of complementary routes emerges as a robust strategy to maximise the production of bioethanol, biogas, biohydrogen, and organic acids from cassava wastes. Biorefinery models consistently demonstrate significant energy gains and reduced environmental impacts, reinforcing cassava residues as a strategic platform for circular economy applications. Consequently, the integrated valorisation of cassava processing wastes represents a relevant opportunity to enhance technological sustainability and environmental performance across cassava value chains.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.