ArticleInternational journal of breast cancer2026
Tumor Budding Unveiled: Clinicopathological Correlations and Survival Insights From a Tertiary Care Cancer Center of India.
Article in International journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tumor Budding Unveiled: Clinicopathological Correlations and Survival Insights From a Tertiary Care Cancer Center of India.International journal of breast cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tumor budding (TB), defined as isolated single cells or small clusters at the invasive front, has emerged as a potential adverse prognostic marker in breast cancer (BC), though its clinical utility remains uncertain. Methods: This retrospective study included 229 cases of invasive breast carcinoma. TB was assessed on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections, with AE1/AE3 immunostaining in equivocal cases. TB was analyzed both as a continuous and categorical variable for its association with clinicopathological parameters, including lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), distant metastasis, tumor size, nodal stage, age, and hormone receptor status. Patients were followed for 5.75 years to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: High tumor budding (HTB) was identified in a significant proportion of cases and showed strong correlation with adverse clinicopathological features, including lymph node positivity, LVI, higher nodal stage, and distant metastasis. HTB was more frequent in hormone receptor-positive tumors and less common in triple-negative BC. No significant association was observed between TB and PFS or OS during follow-up. Conclusion: TB is a cost-effective histopathological marker associated with adverse clinicopathological features in BC. Although no significant association with survival outcomes was observed in the present cohort, its correlation with established adverse pathological parameters highlights its potential clinical relevance. Larger prospective studies with standardized assessment criteria are needed to further clarify its prognostic significance and clinical utility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.