ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Microglial immunosurveillance after ischemic stroke: dynamic phenotypes, neurovascular interactions, and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic stroke induces complex neuroimmune responses that extend beyond acute neuronal injury and involve dynamic interactions among microglia, the neurovascular unit, and peripheral immune cells. Microglia rapidly transition from homeostatic surveillance to damage sensing, cytokine production, phagocytic clearance, and tissue remodeling. Their functions are highly context-dependent: early microglial responses may promote blood-brain barrier protection, debris clearance, and tissue repair, whereas excessive or persistent activation may exacerbate oxidative stress, inflammasome signaling, complement-mediated synaptic pruning, white matter injury, and chronic peri-infarct inflammation. Recent single-cell studies have challenged the traditional M1/M2 framework by identifying multiple transcriptional states that vary across disease stages, brain regions, and systemic immune conditions. Following stroke, microglia interact closely with endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, infiltrating macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets, thereby linking local neuroinflammation with systemic immunosuppression and infection risk. Therapeutic strategies should therefore seek to redirect specific microglial programs rather than broadly suppress neuroinflammation. Potential approaches include modulating inflammasome and complement signaling, oxidative stress, phagocytosis, lipid metabolism, and repair-associated trophic functions. Clinical translation remains limited by narrow therapeutic windows, patient heterogeneity, difficulty distinguishing resident microglia from infiltrating macrophages, and the absence of validated clinical biomarkers. Future research should integrate longitudinal microglial profiling, neurovascular biology, systemic immune monitoring, and functional recovery measures to develop interventions tailored to specific stages of stroke recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.