Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639288›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

What Doctors Wear Matters: Insights From Visitors at Riyadh's Primary Healthcare Centers.

Hamad A Alhussain, Abdullah A Alajlan, Omar Alghamdi, Abdulazia S Alhodairy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hamad A AlhussainFamily Medicine, Family Medicine Academy at Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah A AlajlanFamily Medicine, Family Medicine Academy at Riyadh Second Health Cluster, Riyadh, SAU.
Omar AlghamdiFamily Medicine, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdulazia S AlhodairyCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow a physician dresses has been known, since the time of Hippocrates, to shape the way patients see and relate to their doctor. In a country like Saudi Arabia, where cultural norms, religious values, and medical professionalism intersect in distinctive ways, the question of what physicians ought to wear is more than a trivial matter of aesthetics. Despite a growing literature on this subject, relatively little research has focused specifically on primary healthcare settings within the Gulf region, where the majority of routine patient-physician encounters take place.

objectivesThis study set out to examine how patients attending primary healthcare centers (PHCs) affiliated with the Riyadh Second Health Cluster perceive and rate different physician attire options, to gauge the overall importance they place on appearance, and to explore how attire-related perceptions translate into attitudes toward the doctor-patient relationship.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from the 1st of April to the 31st of May, 2026. A self-administered bilingual (Arabic/English) questionnaire, adapted from validated tools in the literature and reviewed by two family medicine consultants, was completed by 1,176 adult PHC visitors aged 14 years and above. Participants rated male and female physician attire items and 11 relationship/perception outcomes on a five-point Likert scale. Chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied where appropriate, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 33.3 ± 9.8 years; 597 (50.8%) were male. Eight in 10 participants (950; 80.8%; 95% CI: 78.5-83.0%) considered physician appearance important, a finding that held across all demographic subgroups. The white medical lab coat topped the preference list for both male (1005; 85.5%; 95% CI: 83.4-87.5%) and female (922; 78.4%; 95% CI: 76.0-80.8%) physicians. Jeans and expensive/fashionable clothing were broadly disapproved. For female physicians, the niqab/veil (756; 64.3%) and skirt (732; 62.2%) ranked highly alongside modest professional dress. Niqab preference varied significantly by age group (Kruskal-Wallis H = 14.93, p = 0.002), and female participants were more approving of the male national costume than their male counterparts (p = 0.01). Preferred physician attire was associated, across the board, with higher perceived respect (892; 75.9%), greater satisfaction (880; 74.8%), stronger follow-up intention (863; 73.4%), and better anticipated treatment compliance (773; 65.7%).

conclusionThe white coat stands as the clearest, most cross-demographically consistent preference in this PHC population. Cultural modesty norms meaningfully shape how patients envision their female doctors' dress. Perhaps most importantly, how a physician looks appears to touch the very foundation of the therapeutic relationship, affecting willingness to return, comply with treatment, and engage openly. Dress code policies for PHCs in Riyadh should take these preferences seriously.

Indexed as

cultural valuesdoctor–patient relationshipdress codepatient perceptionphysician attireprimary healthcaresaudi arabiawhite coat

Identifiers

PMID42639288
PMCPMC13502923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.