ReviewCureus2026
Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Characterization of Focal Splenic Lesions: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an emerging imaging modality for the characterization of focal splenic lesions, offering real-time evaluation of microvascular perfusion without ionizing radiation. This systematic review assessed the diagnostic performance of CEUS in differentiating benign and malignant splenic lesions using data from five included studies. Across the evidence base, most benign lesions demonstrated sustained or prolonged enhancement, whereas many malignant lesions showed early washout with hypoenhancement, although overlap between lesion types was reported, reflecting underlying vascular disorganization. Diagnostic performance was high, with reported sensitivity ranging from 90% to 98% and specificity from 85% to 95% in primary diagnostic studies. CEUS improved lesion characterization compared with conventional ultrasound and may reduce the need for additional CT or MRI in selected clinical scenarios. However, the evidence was limited by heterogeneity in study design, small sample sizes, and moderate-to-high risk of bias in several studies. CEUS represents a reliable adjunct imaging tool for splenic lesion evaluation, though further large-scale prospective studies are required for standardization and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.