Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639272›Full record

ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2026

Clock drawing test strategies among older adults with and without cognitive impairment.

Bárbara Spenciere, Liana Chaves Mendes Dos Santos, Helenice Charchat-Fichman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bárbara SpencierePontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7135-4661
Liana Chaves Mendes Dos SantosPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1594-4170
Helenice Charchat-FichmanPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Psicologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3797-2105

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to being used as a screening test, the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) has been used to evaluate executive functioning in older adults. Using a new validated scoring method that classifies CDT construction - planning and organizing strategies -, published in a previous article, the strategies used to perform the test in older adults with cognitive impairment were investigated. Objective: Describe and classify the planning strategies used by older adults with cognitive impairment to perform the CDT, using the CDT Strategies scoring method. Methods: The study included 86 older adults, divided into three groups: 45 with mild cognitive impairment, 13 with major cognitive impairment, and 28 controls. Results: The analysis of the results emphasized CDT strategies and the neuropsychological profile of older adults. The subcategories associated with better executive functioning decrease in occurrence as cognitive impairment becomes more pronounced, and the subcategories associated with worse executive functioning increase in frequency. Conclusion: The qualitative analysis proposed by CDT Strategies has clinical utility as a measure of executive functioning.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementia testsExecutive FunctionsStrategic Planning.

Identifiers

PMID42639272
PMCPMC13502885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.