ArticlePublic health action2026
Assessment of the acceptability and usability of an integrated HIV-TB digital portal at anti-retroviral therapy centres in Odisha, India.
Article in Public health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mentorship for research on TB in India: a course on Public Health Implementation Strengthening and Operational Research (MPHISOR).Public health action · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn India, health-facility staff at anti-retroviral therapy (ART) centres enter the tuberculosis (TB) status of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in
objectiveTo determine acceptability and usability of SOCH among health-facility staff for entering TB status of PLHIV in ART centres of Odisha, an Eastern Indian state.
designWe performed a cross-sectional study from June 2025 to January 2026 in 17 ART centres of Odisha. Acceptability was assessed using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model and usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS).
resultsAmong 33 staff, median (interquartile range [IQR]) individual scores for four constructs (maximum score: 20) ranged between 15 (14-16) and 16 (12-17). Overall median (IQR) SUS score was 42.5 (31.2-57.5). Lack of training, technical faults, and entering same information in SOCH and
conclusionIn Odisha, SOCH was acceptable, albeit with low usability. Periodic training of staff, technical audit of SOCH, and enabling interoperability between HIV and TB portals may improve reporting of HIV-TB care cascade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.