ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Enhanced predictability and axis precision of SMILE Pro, a retrospective analysis of myopic astigmatism correction.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate three-month visual and refractive outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) Pro with the VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser for myopic astigmatism correction and to compare results with previously reported VISUMAX 800 and VisuMax 500 outcomes.
methodsRetrospective, observational clinical study. Records of 64 patients (128 eyes) who underwent SMILE Pro using the VISUMAX 800 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) between June and November 2024 were reviewed. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative data were analyzed in eyes with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 1.0 or better, including spherical equivalent (SE), refractive astigmatism, and vector analysis. Patients were classified into low (≤1.50 D) and high (>1.50 D) astigmatism subgroups.
resultsThe mean age of 64 patients (128 eyes) was 26.10±4.25y (19-36y). Attempted and achieved SE were strongly correlated (
conclusionSMILE Pro using the VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser provides safe and predictable correction of myopic astigmatism with good axis alignment. However, the observed undercorrection in higher cylinders suggests that further optimization of astigmatic nomograms may improve refractive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.