Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42639202›Full record

ReviewMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2026

Essential visual skills for cricket performance and talent development: a review of the literature.

Ncomi Primrose Lukhele, Lourens Millard, Gerrit Jan Breukelman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ncomi Primrose LukheleDepartment of Human Movement Science, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Lourens MillardDepartment of Human Movement Science, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.
Gerrit Jan BreukelmanDepartment of Human Movement Science, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, KwaZulu Natal, Republic of South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vision is fundamental to cricket performance, enabling players to process complex visual information and execute accurate motor responses under severe temporal constraints. Although numerous visual skills have been associated with cricket performance, uncertainty remains regarding their relative importance and practical application in talent identification and player development. This review critically examines the visual skills associated with cricket performance and evaluates their relevance for talent identification and player development. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted across multiple electronic sources, including PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, NRC-CISTI, SPORTDiscus via EBSCOhost, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Where available, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), together with free-text keywords related to cricket, vision, and visual performance were combined using Boolean operators. Eligible English-language sources included cross-sectional, longitudinal, cohort, and intervention studies; narrative and systematic reviews; and relevant books, book chapters, dissertations, theses, and conference proceedings. Retrieved publications were screened for eligibility, and data were extracted and synthesized narratively according to the visual skills examined and their reported associations with cricket performance, talent identification, and player development. For narrative synthesis, the identified visual skills were conceptually classified into visual hardware skills, comprising fundamental, non-task-specific optometric and binocular visual abilities, and visual software skills, encompassing task-related gaze-control, visual-information-processing, perceptual-cognitive, and visuomotor abilities. Results: A total of 85 records were identified through the literature search, of which 15 duplicates were removed. Of the 70 records screened, 50 underwent full-text assessment, and 30 publications met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final narrative synthesis. The identified visual skills were organized into two broad conceptual categories: visual hardware skills, comprising fundamental, non-task-specific optometric and binocular visual abilities, and visual software skills, encompassing task-related gaze-control, visual-information-processing, perceptual-cognitive, and visuomotor abilities. The available literature suggested that these complementary skill domains may contribute to cricket performance, with visual hardware skills supporting visual input and visual software skills supporting the interpretation and translation of visual information into sport-specific motor responses. However, the strength and directness of the evidence varied across individual skills. Conclusions: This review highlights the possible complementary roles of visual hardware and visual software skills in cricket performance and provides a conceptual framework for examining the sport's visual demands. The 14 visual skills identified from the available literature may inform the future development and evaluation of cricket-specific visual assessment batteries and targeted vision training programs. Further direct research is required to determine whether assessment or enhancement of these skills improves talent identification, player development, or performance in competitive cricket.

Indexed as

athletic performancesbinocular visioncricket sportsmotor skillocular accommodationsensory feedbacksensory processingsportsport medicinetalentvision testvisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID42639202
PMCPMC13502261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.