ArticleMedical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal2026
Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Arabic 5-item dry eye questionnaire (DEQ-5) in a conflict-affected population in southern Palestine.
Article in Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dry eye symptoms are common among populations exposed to prolonged stress and adverse living conditions, yet brief patient-reported symptom assessment instruments have rarely been evaluated in conflict-affected settings. This study aimed to conduct a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Arabic Dry Eye Questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5) among internally displaced adults in the southern Gaza Strip, with an emphasis on internal consistency, internal structure, and exploratory cross-language agreement. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Al-Mawasi camps among internally displaced adults using snowball sampling. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using paper-based questionnaires. The Arabic DEQ-5 was administered to the primary study sample, while a bilingual subset completed the Arabic version first and the English version 72 hours later for an exploratory fixed-order bilingual agreement analysis. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega total. Item-level analyses included corrected item-total correlations and Cronbach's alpha if item deleted. Internal structure was examined using eigenvalue decomposition, scree plot inspection, and parallel analysis. Bilingual agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]), quadratic weighted kappa, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Complete Arabic DEQ-5 responses were obtained from 234 participants. Mean (SD) total DEQ-5 score was 8.52 (3.65). Overall, 181 participants (77.4%) met the prespecified symptom-screening threshold of a DEQ-5 score ≥ 6, including 49 (20.9%) with scores ≥ 12. The Arabic DEQ-5 showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.73; McDonald's ω Conclusions: The Arabic DEQ-5 demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and supportive evidence of a dominant one-factor structure in this conflict-affected displaced population. In the bilingual subset, total scores showed good point-estimate agreement; however, variable item-level agreement and wide limits of agreement do not support individual-level interchangeability between the Arabic and English versions. These findings suggest that the Arabic DEQ-5 may serve as a practical brief instrument for assessing dry eye symptoms in humanitarian and field research settings. However, because external validation measures, clinical assessments, confirmatory psychometric analyses, and test-retest reliability were beyond the scope of this study, the findings should be interpreted as a preliminary psychometric evaluation rather than a comprehensive validation. Further multicenter psychometric validation in diverse Arabic-speaking populations, including larger bilingual samples, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.