ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Visual and accommodative outcomes after femtosecond LASIK with and without monovision in patients over 40 years.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate changes in visual acuity and accommodation function following femtosecond laser-assisted
methodsThis prospective, non-randomized cohort study included patients who were divided into an FS-LASIK binocular group (full correction) and an FS-LASIK monovision group. The binocular group consisted of Group 1 (15 patients) with simple myopia and Group 2 (12 patients) with myopia and presbyopia. The monovision group (Group 3) included 13 patients with myopia and presbyopia. Parameters assessed included the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), the uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), binocular cross-cylinder (BCC), accommodative amplitude (AMP), positive relative accommodation (PRA), negative relative accommodation (NRA), and accommodative facility (AF). Patient satisfaction was evaluated at 3mo postoperatively.
resultsA total of 40 patients (80 eyes) were enrolled (mean age 43.63±3.666y; 12 males). At 3mo after FS-LASIK, UCVA improved significantly in all patients (
conclusionFS-LASIK combined with monovision is an effective treatment for patients aged over 40y with myopia and presbyopia, which not only improves visual acuity but also achieves high patient satisfaction and improves postoperative BCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.