ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Binocular Visual Function in Children Wearing Single-Vision or Highly Aspherical Lenslet Spectacle Lenses Assessed with a Tablet-Based Dichoptic Platform.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate multi-distance binocular visual function in children using a tablet-based dichoptic platform and compare performance between single-vision and highly aspherical lenslet (HAL) spectacle lenses. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 300 children aged 4 to 17 years wearing single-vision spectacle lenses (n = 154) or HAL spectacle lenses (n = 146). Outcomes included foveal simultaneous-perception non-composite responses, peripheral simultaneous-perception non-normal responses, and fine, dynamic, and gross stereopsis from 0.4 to 3.0 m. Generalized estimating equations clustered by participant evaluated lens type and testing distance, with adjustment for age, sex, myopia magnitude, interocular spherical-equivalent difference, and mean absolute cylinder. Results: Fine stereopsis declined significantly as testing distance increased and was rarely measurable at 2.0 m. Compared with 0.4 m, the adjusted odds of measurable fine stereopsis were lower at 1.5 m (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.81; P = 0.003) and 2.0 m (aOR = 0.08; P < 0.001). In adjusted observational analyses, HAL lens wear was associated with higher odds of measurable dynamic (aOR = 1.68; P = 0.024) and gross stereopsis (aOR = 2.51; P = 0.006) than single-vision lens wear. Fine stereopsis remained comparable between the two groups (aOR = 0.99; P = 0.960). Foveal non-composite responses were uncommon at 0.4 m but highly prevalent at 3.0 m (>87%) regardless of lens type, while peripheral simultaneous perception remained mostly normal. Conclusions: Tablet-based binocular visual performance declined as the testing distance increased. In this cross-sectional observational analysis, children wearing HAL spectacle lenses showed higher adjusted odds of measurable dynamic and gross stereopsis than those wearing single-vision lenses, while fine stereopsis remained comparable. These findings provide preliminary clinical evidence regarding binocular visual performance with HAL lens wear and warrant confirmation in longitudinal studies across different myopia levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.