ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
Genome-Wide Prenatal cfDNA Screening and the Obstetric Incidentalome: Maternal Cancer, Placental Mosaicism, and Pregnancy Risk.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening was introduced as a highly accurate test for common fetal aneuploidies, but genome-wide implementation has exposed a broader and more complex clinical landscape. Maternal plasma cfDNA is a composite biological signal rather than a fetal signal in isolation. It contains predominantly maternal cfDNA, a pregnancy-derived placental fraction that serves as the practical fetal proxy in screening, and, in selected circumstances, cfDNA derived from maternal pathological processes. As a result, abnormal, complex, discordant, or nonreportable cfDNA findings may reflect fetal chromosomal disease, confined placental mosaicism (CPM), rare autosomal trisomy (RAT), maternal copy-number variation or mosaicism, benign maternal lesions, vanishing twin, technical artifact, or occult maternal malignancy. This review uses the concept of the "obstetric incidentalome" to integrate these maternal, placental, fetal, and technical findings into a single interpretive model for genome-wide prenatal cfDNA screening. Particular emphasis is placed on unusual cfDNA patterns associated with maternal cancer, rare RATs as potential markers of placental mosaicism and placenta-mediated pregnancy risk, and the diagnostic ambiguity created when placental and fetal genomes differ. We propose that the clinical value of genome-wide cfDNA screening lies less in expanding the catalogue of detectable abnormalities than in resolving the biological origin and clinical relevance of abnormal signals. A coherent clinical pathway should combine fetal diagnostic confirmation, selective maternal evaluation, genetic counseling, and risk-adapted obstetric surveillance while avoiding indiscriminate overdiagnosis. The next phase of evidence should determine whether structured management of the obstetric incidentalome improves maternal and perinatal outcomes beyond diagnostic yield alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.