ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Network hierarchy in Alzheimer's and Lewy body spectrum disorders: functional gradients, cognitive phenotypes, and translational gaps.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dementia syndromes alter cortical hierarchy in addition to individual brain regions. Functional connectivity gradients offer a continuous, low-dimensional framework for examining these hierarchy-level changes. This focused structured narrative review combines a transparent evidence audit with a candidate-target comparative framework for evaluating gradient evidence in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Lewy body spectrum disorders, including dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson's disease dementia. The evidence is asymmetric. AD has comparatively direct evidence for metric-specific change at the default-mode/transmodal end of the principal cortical gradient, whereas Lewy body disease has sparse and partly negative direct functional-gradient evidence. The review defines evidence tiers and eligibility rules for translating conventional functional-connectivity findings into testable gradient hypotheses, and applies them to the Lewy body literature. This framework is intended to improve evidence appraisal when emerging neuroimaging methods are applied to heterogeneous disease populations. Current data support metric-specific principal-gradient change and transmodal dedifferentiation in AD. In Lewy body disease, posterior cortical, attention, salience, and control-network findings remain FC-derived candidate targets for direct testing. The review also addresses gradient-estimation methods, disease-specific confounds, mixed pathology, brain-behavior associations, and validation standards. Gradient measures are not proposed as ready clinical biomarkers. Instead, the review specifies the evidence required to determine whether hierarchy-axis phenotyping adds value beyond conventional connectivity, atrophy, and molecular biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.