ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
The gut-liver axis: microbial mechanisms and therapeutic implications in MAFLD.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, currently affecting approximately 32% of the global adult population.Initially presenting as simple hepatic steatosis, MAFLD often progresses to severe cardiovascular complications, imposing significant healthcare and economic burdens. Current clinical management relies primarily on lifestyle interventions, with few targeted pharmacotherapies available, highlighting the urgent need for deeper mechanistic understanding and innovative treatments. A growing body of research highlights the critical role of intestinal homeostasis in the development and progression of MAFLD. Modern studies refer to the bidirectional communication between the gut and liver via the biliary tract, portal vein, and systemic circulation as the "gut-liver axis." This structural connection makes the liver more susceptible to damage from gut-derived microbes, metabolites, endotoxins, and inflammatory mediators, positioning the liver as a key target organ exposed to the intestinal microenvironment. For instance: LPS (endotoxin) a component of Gram-negative bacteria, activates the TLR4 signaling pathway, triggering NF-κB and promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6. This amplifies inflammation and compromises the intestinal barrier, allowing bacteria and their products to enter the liver via the portal vein and induce liver injury. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs, e.g., butyrate), produced by the fermentation of dietary fiber, inhibit histone deacetylase (HDAC) and activate G-protein-coupled receptors (e.g., GPR43, GPR109A). These mechanisms promote the differentiation of regulatory T cells (Treg) and the production of IgA antibodies, thereby suppressing inflammation and strengthening the mucosal barrier.Secondary bile acids (e.g., 3-oxoLCA), generated through microbial modification of bile acids, can regulate the Treg/Th17 balance via nuclear receptors such as the vitamin D receptor (VDR). Numerous studies have observed microbial dysbiosis in MAFLD, characterized by an increase in Bacteroidetes and a decrease in Firmicutes.Emerging therapies targeting gut microbiota-including microbial metabolite modulators (HDCA, 4-HPAA) and multi-target traditional Chinese medicines (silymarin, Cornus officinalis glycosides)-demonstrate promising therapeutic potential when combined with interventions like probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.