ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Research progress in the application of double-lumen endobronchial tubes and bronchial blockers in thoracic surgery.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of thoracic surgery toward minimally invasive and precise approaches, as well as the popularization of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robot-assisted video-assisted thoracic surgery (RAVATS), higher requirements have been put forward for one-lung ventilation (OLV) technology during anesthesia. An ideal lung isolation technique not only needs to provide a good surgical field of view but also should minimize the incidence of airway injury, hypoxemia, and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Currently, double-lumen endobronchial tubes (DLTs) and bronchial blockers (BBs) are the two main tools for achieving OLV. This narrative review summarizes the development status and main surgical types of thoracic surgery in recent years, and analyzes the application of DLTs and BBs in operations such as pneumonectomy, esophageal surgery, and mediastinal surgery. Through a comprehensive comparison of high-quality randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies, the differences between the two airway management devices in terms of lung collapse quality, positioning time, incidence of airway injury, and postoperative recovery indicators are explored. Studies have shown that DLTs have advantages in lung isolation speed and bronchial suction efficiency, while BBs exhibit unique value in difficult airway management, reducing postoperative sore throat, and isolating specific lobes. Moreover, retrospective studies suggest a potential association between BBs use and lower PPCs rates, but this finding requires confirmation by high-quality randomized trials. This article aims to provide evidence-based airway management strategy references for thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists when facing different surgical types and specific patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.